Merge lp://staging/~nataliabidart/ubuntu-sso-client/assert-is-gone into lp://staging/ubuntu-sso-client

Proposed by Natalia Bidart
Status: Merged
Approved by: Alejandro J. Cura
Approved revision: 608
Merged at revision: 606
Proposed branch: lp://staging/~nataliabidart/ubuntu-sso-client/assert-is-gone
Merge into: lp://staging/ubuntu-sso-client
Diff against target: 90 lines (+17/-20)
3 files modified
ubuntu_sso/gui.py (+13/-16)
ubuntu_sso/logger.py (+3/-3)
ubuntu_sso/tests/test_gui.py (+1/-1)
To merge this branch: bzr merge lp://staging/~nataliabidart/ubuntu-sso-client/assert-is-gone
Reviewer Review Type Date Requested Status
Alejandro J. Cura (community) Approve
John Lenton (community) Approve
Review via email: mp+34107@code.staging.launchpad.net

Commit message

* Made DBus signal connection more robust (LP: #624127).

Description of the change

Made DBus signal connection more robust (LP: #624127).

To test you cna use the script attached in the linked bug, and see how without the branch the "assert actual is None" is failing if executed more than once, and with this branch we get WARNING messages.

To post a comment you must log in.
607. By Natalia Bidart

Restoring code from trunk.

Revision history for this message
John Lenton (chipaca) :
review: Approve
Revision history for this message
Alejandro J. Cura (alecu) wrote :

I really like that the bug mentioned is being resolved, thanks.

I don't like that old code is being turned off in this same branch and without an explicit bug number. By that I mean the commented lines in bin/ubuntu-sso-login.

review: Needs Fixing
Revision history for this message
John Lenton (chipaca) wrote :

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 08:19:37PM -0000, Alejandro J. Cura wrote:
> Review: Needs Fixing
> I really like that the bug mentioned is being resolved, thanks.
>
> I don't like that old code is being turned off in this same branch and without an explicit bug number. By that I mean the commented lines in bin/ubuntu-sso-login.

that's being reverted. I think nessita forgot to push it, because I
pointed it out before approving (and she fixed it). Don't mark the
branch approved until that's fixed :)

Revision history for this message
Natalia Bidart (nataliabidart) wrote :

> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 08:19:37PM -0000, Alejandro J. Cura wrote:
> > Review: Needs Fixing
> > I really like that the bug mentioned is being resolved, thanks.
> >
> > I don't like that old code is being turned off in this same branch and
> without an explicit bug number. By that I mean the commented lines in bin
> /ubuntu-sso-login.
>
> that's being reverted. I think nessita forgot to push it, because I
> pointed it out before approving (and she fixed it). Don't mark the
> branch approved until that's fixed :)

Sorry! I've pushed a while ago but to the wrong location. Pushed correctly now.

608. By Natalia Bidart

Incresing backupCount to 5.

Revision history for this message
Alejandro J. Cura (alecu) wrote :

Looks fine now. Thanks!

review: Approve

Preview Diff

[H/L] Next/Prev Comment, [J/K] Next/Prev File, [N/P] Next/Prev Hunk
The diff is not available at this time. You can reload the page or download it.

Subscribers

People subscribed via source and target branches