On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 08:39:52AM -0000, Martin Pool wrote:
> I ran the tests in your branch and they all passed. So we haven't gone backwards. If it's possible to easily add some tests for what was broken, that would be nice. Otherwise, let's just merge it.
+1
It'd be nice to have a single function that can resolve marks (and
just does .lstrip(":") for now, but perhaps more later).
It also seems reasonable enough to land as-is, though.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 08:39:52AM -0000, Martin Pool wrote:
> I ran the tests in your branch and they all passed. So we haven't gone backwards. If it's possible to easily add some tests for what was broken, that would be nice. Otherwise, let's just merge it.
+1
It'd be nice to have a single function that can resolve marks (and
just does .lstrip(":") for now, but perhaps more later).
It also seems reasonable enough to land as-is, though.
Cheers,
Jelmer