> Looks good to me! +1
>
> #1:
> + scope = "openstack"
>
> The scope name seems a bit too specific, as swift and ceph could be used
> outside of an OpenStack deployment.
> Maybe something like "storage"?
Ok, I wasn't very happy with "openstack" anyhow. Storage it is, done!
> Looks good to me! +1
>
> #1:
> + scope = "openstack"
>
> The scope name seems a bit too specific, as swift and ceph could be used
> outside of an OpenStack deployment.
> Maybe something like "storage"?
Ok, I wasn't very happy with "openstack" anyhow. Storage it is, done!
>
>
> 2:
> This seems like an accidental change.
Yes, indeed. Fixed.