On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Michael Vogt <email address hidden>wrote:
> Review: Approve
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> My only minor concern is that order-id and subscription-id being identical
> is a bit confusing, maybe we should have a the subscription id encoded in
> the order-id much like you suggested? Like "sca_subscriptionid:%s" %
> subscription['id'] or something? just to make it obvious that they are not
> the same (or if they are the same we could make this obvious too as the
> subscription-id is the bit that will be used by
> aptdaemon/software-center-purchase-helper to actually retrieve the app.
>
Thanks mvo - I've pushed that change with r26, the relevant test change
r887 on the sca branch at:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Michael Vogt <email address hidden>wrote:
> Review: Approve onid:%s" % software- center- purchase- helper to actually retrieve the app.
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> My only minor concern is that order-id and subscription-id being identical
> is a bit confusing, maybe we should have a the subscription id encoded in
> the order-id much like you suggested? Like "sca_subscripti
> subscription['id'] or something? just to make it obvious that they are not
> the same (or if they are the same we could make this obvious too as the
> subscription-id is the bit that will be used by
> aptdaemon/
>
Thanks mvo - I've pushed that change with r26, the relevant test change
r887 on the sca branch at:
https:/ /code.launchpad .net/~michael. nelson/ software- center- agent/further- tests-scaclient /+merge/ 139717
> -- /code.launchpad .net/~michael. nelson/ software- center/ add-initiate- purchase/ +merge/ 137831
>
> https:/
> Your team Canonical Consumer Applications Hackers is subscribed to branch
> lp:~canonical-ca-hackers/software-center/scaclient.
>
-- micknelson. wordpress. com/
Michael Nelson - http://