> Thanks! This looks fine, but I'll need to coordinate landing this with
> adjustments in the production importer service instance, since it references
> the old names.
Sounds good, thanks!
> I wonder if it's possible to add to CI something to help any non-inclusive
> wording slipping in in the future? Not needed for this MP though.
There should be a way. Some of us on the inclusive naming team have been looking into it. I can get a merge request in for it once we've got it standardized
> Thanks! This looks fine, but I'll need to coordinate landing this with
> adjustments in the production importer service instance, since it references
> the old names.
Sounds good, thanks!
> I wonder if it's possible to add to CI something to help any non-inclusive
> wording slipping in in the future? Not needed for this MP though.
There should be a way. Some of us on the inclusive naming team have been looking into it. I can get a merge request in for it once we've got it standardized