>> I don't feel particularly qualified to review this, but it looks OK I
>> guess. We're not actually running CTS currently, right?
>
> Yes, we are not running the CTS because the bug it consumes the CPU.
> But this branch is not for that problem, it is just updated to use the latest cts-4_1_r1 CTS package.
>
> And I want to investigate the CTS consumes CPU problem based on this branch with the latest CTS package
Yongqin Liu <email address hidden> writes:
>> I don't feel particularly qualified to review this, but it looks OK I
>> guess. We're not actually running CTS currently, right?
>
> Yes, we are not running the CTS because the bug it consumes the CPU.
> But this branch is not for that problem, it is just updated to use the latest cts-4_1_r1 CTS package.
>
> And I want to investigate the CTS consumes CPU problem based on this branch with the latest CTS package
Fair enough. Merge away then :-)