LAVA Android Test

Merge lp://staging/~liuyq0307/lava-android-test/cts-4_1_r1 into lp://staging/lava-android-test

cts-4_1_r1
Merge into trunk

Proposed by Yongqin Liu on 2012-10-08

Status:	Merged
Merged at revision:	212
Proposed branch:	lp://staging/~liuyq0307/lava-android-test/cts-4_1_r1
Merge into:	lp://staging/lava-android-test
Diff against target:	93 lines (+45/-5) 2 files modified lava_android_test/test_definitions/cts/cts_prepare.sh (+3/-3) lava_android_test/test_definitions/cts/cts_wrapper.py (+42/-2)
To merge this branch:	bzr merge lp://staging/~liuyq0307/lava-android-test/cts-4_1_r1
Related bugs:	Link a bug report

Reviewer	Review Type	Date Requested	Status
Linaro Validation Team		2012-10-08	Pending
Review via email: mp+128429@code.staging.launchpad.net

Description of the change

update to use the latest 4.1.r1 package that google provided

Revision history for this message

Michael Hudson-Doyle (mwhudson) wrote on 2012-10-08:

I don't feel particularly qualified to review this, but it looks OK I
guess. We're not actually running CTS currently, right?

Revision history for this message

Yongqin Liu (liuyq0307) wrote on 2012-10-09:

> I don't feel particularly qualified to review this, but it looks OK I
> guess. We're not actually running CTS currently, right?

Yes, we are not running the CTS because the bug it consumes the CPU.
But this branch is not for that problem, it is just updated to use the latest cts-4_1_r1 CTS package.

And I want to investigate the CTS consumes CPU problem based on this branch with the latest CTS package

Revision history for this message

Yongqin Liu (liuyq0307) wrote on 2012-10-09:

Sorry, this is the CTS consumes CPU bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-android/+bug/1034218

Revision history for this message

Michael Hudson-Doyle (mwhudson) wrote on 2012-10-09:

Yongqin Liu <email address hidden> writes:

>> I don't feel particularly qualified to review this, but it looks OK I
>> guess. We're not actually running CTS currently, right?
>
> Yes, we are not running the CTS because the bug it consumes the CPU.
> But this branch is not for that problem, it is just updated to use the latest cts-4_1_r1 CTS package.
>
> And I want to investigate the CTS consumes CPU problem based on this branch with the latest CTS package

Fair enough. Merge away then :-)