I'm not sure I understand the rationale of using another store for this persistent data? why not just use the regular kv() store and just use the same 'namespace' that it already being proposed; it's unlikely to clash with anything else. Plus, the decorator will not be needed, and it simplifies the code.
I'm not sure I understand the rationale of using another store for this persistent data? why not just use the regular kv() store and just use the same 'namespace' that it already being proposed; it's unlikely to clash with anything else. Plus, the decorator will not be needed, and it simplifies the code.