Code review comment for lp://staging/~wesley-wiedenmeier/curtin/1562249

Revision history for this message
Ryan Harper (raharper) wrote :

  - cciss devices have a path at /dev/cciss!c0d0 as well as /dev/cciss/c0d0

Is this true for precise -> yakkety?

Otherwise, it looks good. Thanks for the unittest. Can you add a unittest for the
/dev/cciss/c0d0 case as well? What I mean is will get_blk return value
always be a cciss!c0d0 ? or would it ever return cciss/c0d0 ?

« Back to merge proposal