On 2013-04-22 14:34, Roger Peppe wrote:
> We'd better hope that Go binaries compiled on other series really
> do run on precise then, because that's the way that Quantal and
> Raring users will *always* be running the live tests if we leave
> default-series as precise.
>
> If we're going to test like that, why honestly are we bothering
> with different binaries for different series?
>
> Personally I think it's probably ok that running live tests on
> series X tests instances running series X, but I realise there's no
> right answer here.
Right, for *live* tests, you need to match the client series, because
that is the one that was just compiled and uploaded.
Either that or we actually just say "one set of binaries" which could
simplify the tool infrastructure a lot.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-04-22 14:34, Roger Peppe wrote:
> We'd better hope that Go binaries compiled on other series really
> do run on precise then, because that's the way that Quantal and
> Raring users will *always* be running the live tests if we leave
> default-series as precise.
>
> If we're going to test like that, why honestly are we bothering
> with different binaries for different series?
>
> Personally I think it's probably ok that running live tests on
> series X tests instances running series X, but I realise there's no
> right answer here.
Right, for *live* tests, you need to match the client series, because
that is the one that was just compiled and uploaded.
Either that or we actually just say "one set of binaries" which could
simplify the tool infrastructure a lot.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- www.enigmail. net/
1JGsACgkQJdeBCY SNAAPtDACfdYqIx i+M3YYt4kczMPPJ A7/d 0WR+GVKKdynjx8B P6
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAlF
X7AAoMm1u8jnZz+
=zrR3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----