Code review comment for lp://staging/~sdeziel/apparmor/wireshark-refresh

On 2016-04-14 14:03:27, Simon Déziel wrote:
> On 2016-04-13 05:50 PM, Seth Arnold wrote:
> > It feels like the accessibility dbus rules may be better suited in an #include.
>
> Or maybe abstractions/dbus-accessibility-strict is just too strict?

dbus-accessibility-strict is for talking to dbus-daemon itself on the
accessibility bus.

dbus-accessibility is for doing any action on the accessibility bus.

Note that the rules you have are for talking to a service on the session
bus. I'm thinking that there should be an "accessibility-services" (or
maybe just "accessibility") abstraction which has the a11y rules and
also includes dbus-accessibility-strict?