> [1] I'll change the second test to check result[None:1], otherwise we don't > know if the second parameters is used or not. > > +1!
Good point, I've done it. Thanks for the review.
« Back to merge proposal
> [1] I'll change the second test to check result[None:1], otherwise we don't
> know if the second parameters is used or not.
>
> +1!
Good point, I've done it. Thanks for the review.