Please take a look.
https://codereview.appspot.com/9754043/diff/13001/state/machine.go File state/machine.go (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/9754043/diff/13001/state/machine.go#newcode38 state/machine.go:38: On 2013/05/27 20:23:20, fwereade wrote: > // jobNames MUST NEVER BE CHANGED.
> ...or maybe we could just use ints, as designed originally, and not lumber the > API with guaranteed-inaccurate names. (JobServeAPI is not sensible; it conflates > jobs with tasks.)
renamed to JobManageState as agreed in discussion.
https://codereview.appspot.com/9754043/
« Back to merge proposal
Please take a look.
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/9754043/ diff/13001/ state/machine. go
File state/machine.go (right):
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/9754043/ diff/13001/ state/machine. go#newcode38 go:38:
state/machine.
On 2013/05/27 20:23:20, fwereade wrote:
> // jobNames MUST NEVER BE CHANGED.
> ...or maybe we could just use ints, as designed originally, and not inaccurate names. (JobServeAPI is not sensible; it
lumber the
> API with guaranteed-
conflates
> jobs with tasks.)
renamed to JobManageState as agreed in discussion.
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/9754043/