John A Meinel wrote:
> I should also note. I tried hard to make a pure-python StaticTuple just inherit from a regular tuple, so that they would hopefully not have any overhead versus a normal tuple. However, note that we're currently working out some details, and it may have a small amount of overhead.
I'm still seeing weird results on Windows. But Andrew Bennetts clarified
that it does, indeed, save him 8 bytes per object on Linux w/ python
2.6.4rc2. (for me, they are always 8-bytes bigger on python 2.6.2 and
2.6.4.)
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
John A Meinel wrote:
> I should also note. I tried hard to make a pure-python StaticTuple just inherit from a regular tuple, so that they would hopefully not have any overhead versus a normal tuple. However, note that we're currently working out some details, and it may have a small amount of overhead.
I just added this proposal:
https:/ /code.launchpad .net/~jameinel/ bzr/2.1- pure-static- tuple/+ merge/14006
I'm still seeing weird results on Windows. But Andrew Bennetts clarified
that it does, indeed, save him 8 bytes per object on Linux w/ python
2.6.4rc2. (for me, they are always 8-bytes bigger on python 2.6.2 and
2.6.4.)
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- enigmail. mozdev. org/
mePIACgkQJdeBCY SNAAPwMQCgoxzgj aSq4vMLlcmdxq+ J5Txu wdpuKa6HSjFKHl7 5GrRwqkm
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAkr
FA4AoKHt/
=gMTk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----