thanks for the explanation, to me it looks like that check is low cost and makes things a bit more robust, so +1 for including it (though in practice it's likely only online-account is going to have the issue and we can batch those so it doesn't really matter much easier way)
thanks for the explanation, to me it looks like that check is low cost and makes things a bit more robust, so +1 for including it (though in practice it's likely only online-account is going to have the issue and we can batch those so it doesn't really matter much easier way)