On Thursday 13 January 2011 22:04:39 you wrote:
> Great. Note that it won't be any faster *unless* we're able to issue
> the result from an index, *or* its unsorted.
Well in the cases where it checks to see if something has a count before
accessing results[0] I'd say that's an easy win :)
On Thursday 13 January 2011 22:04:39 you wrote:
> Great. Note that it won't be any faster *unless* we're able to issue
> the result from an index, *or* its unsorted.
Well in the cases where it checks to see if something has a count before
accessing results[0] I'd say that's an easy win :)