On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 8:48 AM, Tim Penhey<email address hidden> wrote:
> Review: Approve
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:03:07 Jonathan Lange wrote:
>> If possible, I'd rather land this branch now with some performance
>> issues than in 2 months time.
>
> I agree.
>
>> > Also, it shouldn't really return anything if there is not a branch set.
>>
>> Why do you say that?
>
> OK, I guess not. As long as the documentation says that the bzr_path is the
> path of the branch if there was a branch set.
>
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 8:48 AM, Tim Penhey<email address hidden> wrote:
> Review: Approve
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:03:07 Jonathan Lange wrote:
>> If possible, I'd rather land this branch now with some performance
>> issues than in 2 months time.
>
> I agree.
>
>> > Also, it shouldn't really return anything if there is not a branch set.
>>
>> Why do you say that?
>
> OK, I guess not. As long as the documentation says that the bzr_path is the
> path of the branch if there was a branch set.
>
Done.
Landing now.
jml