Breezy

Code review comment for lp://staging/~jelmer/brz/revno-order

  1. revno-order
  2. Merge into 3.0
Revision history for this message
Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer) wrote :

> Also, not totally clear to me from the change, but presumably implicit, revno here
> is always enforced as a simple mainline rev?
Yep.

« Back to merge proposal