> I just didn't want '*' in there and they seem to be using one letter
> hostnames, so I went with that. Note this:
> [a-z][a-z0-9]+
>
> requires at least a two-character hostname and would not resolve the issue for
> me.
right,
>
> I forgot about the translation of 'https?://*.facebook.com/*' to
> 'https?://[^\\./]*.facebook.com/*'. I would be fine with:
> 'https?://*.facebook.com/*'. Should I resubmit?
I'd say yes, just to avoid too much heterogeneous approaches when we can,
> I just didn't want '*' in there and they seem to be using one letter
> hostnames, so I went with that. Note this:
> [a-z][a-z0-9]+
>
> requires at least a two-character hostname and would not resolve the issue for
> me.
right,
> ://*.facebook. com/*' to ://[^\\ ./]*.facebook. com/*'. I would be fine with: ://*.facebook. com/*'. Should I resubmit?
> I forgot about the translation of 'https?
> 'https?
> 'https?
I'd say yes, just to avoid too much heterogeneous approaches when we can,