On 10 January 2014 09:27, Julian Edwards <email address hidden> wrote: > We do need to report success, so some way of IDing the test run on a > hardware basis would be the best way forwards here (and then dupe on that).
+1. I'll revert this branch for starters.
« Back to merge proposal
On 10 January 2014 09:27, Julian Edwards <email address hidden> wrote:
> We do need to report success, so some way of IDing the test run on a
> hardware basis would be the best way forwards here (and then dupe on that).
+1. I'll revert this branch for starters.