On 07/24/2013 11:59 AM, Javier Collado wrote:
> Just for my own curiosity, I tried to check that the changes were not needed if the pattern are just strings (which are converted to arrays internally), but that didn't work. Shouldn't that have worked?
On 07/24/2013 11:59 AM, Javier Collado wrote:
> Just for my own curiosity, I tried to check that the changes were not needed if the pattern are just strings (which are converted to arrays internally), but that didn't work. Shouldn't that have worked?
hmm- that type test fails when I run it at home?