Please take a look.
https://codereview.appspot.com/8540050/diff/10001/cmd/juju/upgradecharm.go File cmd/juju/upgradecharm.go (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/8540050/diff/10001/cmd/juju/upgradecharm.go#newcode46 cmd/juju/upgradecharm.go:46: as the old charm. On 2013/04/26 15:06:33, rog wrote: > probably worth reflowing all this text.
Done.
https://codereview.appspot.com/8540050/diff/10001/cmd/juju/upgradecharm.go#newcode51 cmd/juju/upgradecharm.go:51: to upgrade to, rather than the newest one. This cannot be combined with --switch. On 2013/04/26 15:06:33, rog wrote: > perhaps add:
> To specify a given revision number with --switch, give > it in the charm URL, for instance cs:wordpress-5 > would specify revision number 5 of the wordpress charm.
> ?
https://codereview.appspot.com/8540050/diff/10001/cmd/juju/upgradecharm.go#newcode133 cmd/juju/upgradecharm.go:133: // This is not a local repository. On 2013/04/26 15:06:33, rog wrote: > i think that's self evident from the condition on the if statement.
Removed.
https://codereview.appspot.com/8540050/
« Back to merge proposal
Please take a look.
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/8540050/ diff/10001/ cmd/juju/ upgradecharm. go upgradecharm. go (right):
File cmd/juju/
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/8540050/ diff/10001/ cmd/juju/ upgradecharm. go#newcode46 upgradecharm. go:46: as the old charm.
cmd/juju/
On 2013/04/26 15:06:33, rog wrote:
> probably worth reflowing all this text.
Done.
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/8540050/ diff/10001/ cmd/juju/ upgradecharm. go#newcode51 upgradecharm. go:51: to upgrade to, rather than the newest one.
cmd/juju/
This cannot be combined with --switch.
On 2013/04/26 15:06:33, rog wrote:
> perhaps add:
> To specify a given revision number with --switch, give
> it in the charm URL, for instance cs:wordpress-5
> would specify revision number 5 of the wordpress charm.
> ?
Done.
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/8540050/ diff/10001/ cmd/juju/ upgradecharm. go#newcode133 upgradecharm. go:133: // This is not a local repository.
cmd/juju/
On 2013/04/26 15:06:33, rog wrote:
> i think that's self evident from the condition on the if statement.
Removed.
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/8540050/