On Feb 06, 2013, at 02:04 PM, Alejandro J. Cura wrote:
>One comment: the oauth_authenticate method changed changed here is only used
>(afaict) from lp:ubuntuone-client ActionQueue.authenticate(), and with a
>different signature. That means that with this change a new branch for
>ubuntuone-client would be needed.
Ah right, my changes to ubuntuone-client didn't change the call signature over
there.
>Instead, I propose that the changes to the signature of oauth_authenticate in
>this branch are reverted, and that the compatibility properties defined in
>lp:~barry/ubuntuone-client/lp1077089 are used instead, like:
>
>135 + client = Client(token.key, token.secret, consumer.key, consumer.secret ...
>
>Does this seem reasonable?
It does, good catch.
I suppose if we wanted to get rid of this API backward compatibility hack, we
could do that in a future branch.
On Feb 06, 2013, at 02:04 PM, Alejandro J. Cura wrote:
>One comment: the oauth_authenticate method changed changed here is only used authenticate( ), and with a
>(afaict) from lp:ubuntuone-client ActionQueue.
>different signature. That means that with this change a new branch for
>ubuntuone-client would be needed.
Ah right, my changes to ubuntuone-client didn't change the call signature over
there.
>Instead, I propose that the changes to the signature of oauth_authenticate in
>this branch are reverted, and that the compatibility properties defined in
>lp:~barry/ubuntuone-client/lp1077089 are used instead, like:
>
>135 + client = Client(token.key, token.secret, consumer.key, consumer.secret ...
>
>Does this seem reasonable?
It does, good catch.
I suppose if we wanted to get rid of this API backward compatibility hack, we
could do that in a future branch.
Branch update.