Merge lp://staging/~adeuring/launchpad/bug-596944-browser into lp://staging/launchpad/db-devel
Status: | Merged |
---|---|
Approved by: | Abel Deuring |
Approved revision: | no longer in the source branch. |
Merged at revision: | 10033 |
Proposed branch: | lp://staging/~adeuring/launchpad/bug-596944-browser |
Merge into: | lp://staging/launchpad/db-devel |
Diff against target: |
373 lines (+155/-93) 7 files modified
lib/lp/bugs/browser/bugtarget.py (+9/-6) lib/lp/bugs/browser/tests/test_bugtarget_configure.py (+6/-2) lib/lp/bugs/browser/tests/test_bugtarget_filebug.py (+37/-0) lib/lp/bugs/interfaces/bugtarget.py (+7/-0) lib/lp/bugs/templates/bugtarget-filebug-search.pt (+92/-83) lib/lp/registry/browser/distributionsourcepackage.py (+2/-1) lib/lp/registry/browser/tests/distributionsourcepackage-views.txt (+2/-1) |
To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp://staging/~adeuring/launchpad/bug-596944-browser |
Related bugs: |
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Curtis Hovey (community) | code | Approve | |
Abel Deuring (community) | Needs Resubmitting | ||
j.c.sackett (community) | code* | Approve | |
Review via email:
|
Commit message
[r=jcsackett,
Description of the change
This branch adds a field to enable/disable duplicate searches to the bug tracker configuration forms for distribution source packages and for products.
The template for filing bugs now renders the "main bug report form" immediately if the duplicate search is disabled.
I talked with Deryck about writing unit tests for the changes, but we think it is better toland the branch before PQM closes tomorrow, so I simply extended an existing page test instead.
test: ./bin/test -vvt xx-product-
no lint, excpet complaints about Moin headers in the page test
Abel--
This looks like a nice branch.
I would really appreciate it if you could clean up the moin headers to restructured text, since that's the direction we seem to be heading in docs/stories.
Also: this may be just prejudice on my part, but it might be worth getting an RC for this branch and building out the unittests for this. Not a blocker for the branch, but an idea.
Aside from that, thanks for cleaning up some formatting and link text while you were at it.