Merge lp://staging/~aacid/unity8/revert_session_screenshotter into lp://staging/unity8

Proposed by Albert Astals Cid
Status: Merged
Approved by: Michael Zanetti
Approved revision: 1850
Merged at revision: 1850
Proposed branch: lp://staging/~aacid/unity8/revert_session_screenshotter
Merge into: lp://staging/unity8
Diff against target: 735 lines (+22/-524)
17 files modified
debian/unity8-private.install (+0/-1)
plugins/CMakeLists.txt (+0/-1)
plugins/SessionGrabber/CMakeLists.txt (+0/-8)
plugins/SessionGrabber/SessionGrabber.qmltypes (+0/-23)
plugins/SessionGrabber/plugin.cpp (+0/-27)
plugins/SessionGrabber/plugin.h (+0/-32)
plugins/SessionGrabber/qmldir (+0/-3)
plugins/SessionGrabber/sessiongrabber.cpp (+0/-135)
plugins/SessionGrabber/sessiongrabber.h (+0/-85)
qml/Stages/ApplicationWindow.qml (+22/-46)
qml/Stages/Splash.qml (+0/-2)
qml/Stages/SpreadDelegate.qml (+0/-1)
tests/plugins/CMakeLists.txt (+0/-1)
tests/plugins/SessionGrabber/CMakeLists.txt (+0/-14)
tests/plugins/SessionGrabber/sessiongrabbertest.cpp (+0/-79)
tests/plugins/SessionGrabber/sessiongrabbertest.qml (+0/-22)
tests/qmltests/Stages/tst_ApplicationWindow.qml (+0/-44)
To merge this branch: bzr merge lp://staging/~aacid/unity8/revert_session_screenshotter
Reviewer Review Type Date Requested Status
Michael Zanetti (community) Approve
PS Jenkins bot (community) continuous-integration Needs Fixing
Review via email: mp+264435@code.staging.launchpad.net

Commit message

Revert Session Screenshotter

Description of the change

 * Are there any related MPs required for this MP to build/function as expected?
No

 * Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of your code change and any related functionality?
Yes

 * Did you make sure that your branch does not contain spurious tags?
Yes

 * If you changed the packaging (debian), did you subscribe the ubuntu-unity team to this MP?
N/A

 * If you changed the UI, has there been a design review?
Seems the new UI isn't as we wanted

To post a comment you must log in.
Revision history for this message
PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote :
review: Needs Fixing (continuous-integration)
Revision history for this message
Michael Zanetti (mzanetti) wrote :

 * Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of the code change and any related functionality?

yes

 * Did CI run pass? If not, please explain why.

as much as it could

 * Did you make sure that the branch does not contain spurious tags?

yes

review: Approve

Preview Diff

[H/L] Next/Prev Comment, [J/K] Next/Prev File, [N/P] Next/Prev Hunk
The diff is not available at this time. You can reload the page or download it.

Subscribers

People subscribed via source and target branches