Ubuntu Apps Directory

Merge lp://staging/~ya-bo-ng/ubuntu-webcatalog/description-styling-update into lp://staging/ubuntu-webcatalog

description-styling-update
Merge into trunk

Proposed by Anthony Dillon on 2014-04-02

Status:	Rejected
Rejected by:	Natalia Bidart on 2015-10-01
Proposed branch:	lp://staging/~ya-bo-ng/ubuntu-webcatalog/description-styling-update
Merge into:	lp://staging/ubuntu-webcatalog
Diff against target:	11 lines (+1/-0) 1 file modified src/webcatalog/static/css/webcatalog.css (+1/-0)
To merge this branch:	bzr merge lp://staging/~ya-bo-ng/ubuntu-webcatalog/description-styling-update
Related bugs:	Link a bug report

Reviewer	Review Type	Date Requested	Status
Canonical Consumer Applications Hackers		2014-04-02	Pending
Review via email: mp+213799@code.staging.launchpad.net

Description of the change

Added line height to the app description styling to increase legibility.

Revision history for this message

Natalia Bidart (nataliabidart) wrote on 2015-10-01:

Setting MP as Rejected to reduce numbers of landing candidates in @reviewlist.
Change status again if this MP is still current.

Revision history for this message

Anthony Dillon (ya-bo-ng) wrote on 2015-10-01:

Natalia,

Why has this MP been rejected instead of reviewed? If you feel this is not a vaild fix then can you state the issue and I'll address your comments.

Thanks,
Ant.

Revision history for this message

Natalia Bidart (nataliabidart) wrote on 2015-10-01:

Hello Anthony!

I applied a general filter to all MPs older than 500 days without activity to be Rejected, explaining to the submitter that they can set it as Needs Fixing again if they consider the MP is still current and valid.

For this particular project, there are no plans to make changes to the current code running in production, nor have any change been applied in a very long time, so IMHO there is no point in merging an MP that will not be released to production.

If you still think the MP should be accepted, please set it as Needs Review and raise it in the Online Services IRC channel.

Thank you for your contributions!
Natalia.

Revision history for this message

Anthony Dillon (ya-bo-ng) wrote on 2015-10-02:

Thanks Natalia,

I wasn't aware there was no further development on this site. I agree there is no point merging this branch if it will not be released.

Is this site due to be taken down? The web team receive bugs about this site. What would you suggest we do in this case?

Thanks,
Any.