Merge lp://staging/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/oneiric/nas/oneiric-201108112112 into lp://staging/ubuntu/oneiric/nas

Proposed by Ubuntu Package Importer
Status: Rejected
Rejected by: Martin Pitt
Proposed branch: lp://staging/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/oneiric/nas/oneiric-201108112112
Merge into: lp://staging/ubuntu/oneiric/nas
Diff against target: 67 lines (+27/-1) (has conflicts)
3 files modified
debian/changelog (+21/-0)
debian/control (+5/-0)
debian/rules (+1/-1)
Text conflict in debian/changelog
Text conflict in debian/control
To merge this branch: bzr merge lp://staging/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/oneiric/nas/oneiric-201108112112
Reviewer Review Type Date Requested Status
Didier Roche-Tolomelli Disapprove
Ubuntu branches Pending
Review via email: mp+73922@code.staging.launchpad.net

Description of the change

The package importer has detected a possible inconsistency between the package history in the archve and the history in bzr. As the archive is authoritative the importer has made lp:ubuntu/oneiric/nas reflect what is in the archive and the old bzr branch has been pushed to lp:~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/oneiric/nas/oneiric-201108112112. This merge proposal was created so that an Ubuntu developer can review the situations and perform a merge/upload if necessary. There are three typical cases where this can happen.
  1. Where someone pushes a change to bzr and someone else uploads the package without that change. This is the reason that this check is done by the importer. If this appears to be the case then a merge/upload should be done if the changes that were in bzr are still desirable.
  2. The importer incorrectly detected the above situation when someone made a change in bzr and then uploaded it.
  3. The importer incorrectly detected the above situation when someone just uploaded a package and didn't touch bzr.

If this case doesn't appear to be the first situation then set the status of the merge proposal to "Rejected" and help avoid the problem in future by filing a bug at https://bugs.launchpad.net/udd linking to this merge proposal.

(this is an automatically generated message)

To post a comment you must log in.
Revision history for this message
Didier Roche-Tolomelli (didrocks) wrote :

ok, missing a rev, was a valid one, the generated branch reflect the archive though

review: Disapprove
Revision history for this message
Didier Roche-Tolomelli (didrocks) wrote :

missing a revision, seems the importer skipped one.

review: Disapprove

Unmerged revisions

12. By Steve Langasek

merge latest version from unstable

11. By Steve Langasek

Build for multiarch.

Preview Diff

[H/L] Next/Prev Comment, [J/K] Next/Prev File, [N/P] Next/Prev Hunk
The diff is not available at this time. You can reload the page or download it.

Subscribers

People subscribed via source and target branches

to all changes: