Merge lp://staging/~tribaal/charms/trusty/landscape-client/resync-charm-helpers-landscape-trunk into lp://staging/~landscape/charms/trusty/landscape-client/trunk

Proposed by Chris Glass
Status: Merged
Merged at revision: 47
Proposed branch: lp://staging/~tribaal/charms/trusty/landscape-client/resync-charm-helpers-landscape-trunk
Merge into: lp://staging/~landscape/charms/trusty/landscape-client/trunk
Diff against target: 1471 lines (+1106/-49)
10 files modified
hooks/charmhelpers/core/fstab.py (+116/-0)
hooks/charmhelpers/core/hookenv.py (+132/-7)
hooks/charmhelpers/core/host.py (+100/-12)
hooks/charmhelpers/core/services/__init__.py (+2/-0)
hooks/charmhelpers/core/services/base.py (+313/-0)
hooks/charmhelpers/core/services/helpers.py (+239/-0)
hooks/charmhelpers/core/templating.py (+51/-0)
hooks/charmhelpers/fetch/__init__.py (+102/-25)
hooks/charmhelpers/fetch/archiveurl.py (+49/-4)
hooks/charmhelpers/fetch/bzrurl.py (+2/-1)
To merge this branch: bzr merge lp://staging/~tribaal/charms/trusty/landscape-client/resync-charm-helpers-landscape-trunk
Reviewer Review Type Date Requested Status
Fernando Correa Neto (community) Approve
David Britton (community) Approve
Adam Collard (community) Approve
Review via email: mp+236088@code.staging.launchpad.net

This proposal supersedes a proposal from 2014-09-26.

Description of the change

This branch resyncs charm-helpers to get the in-memory apt cache fixes.

Produced mechanically by:
bzr co lp:~landscape/charms/trusty/landscape-client/trunk
bzr cd trunk
make sync
bzr add .
bzr commit

To post a comment you must log in.
Revision history for this message
Adam Collard (adam-collard) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal

Err... this is proposed to land in trunk. Not in ~landscape. Happy Friday?

review: Needs Resubmitting
Revision history for this message
Adam Collard (adam-collard) wrote :

Looks good! +1

Didn't have time/machines to deploy on. Fernando assures me he will test it. I've got it pushed to cs:~adam-collard/trusty/landscape-client-0 though

review: Approve
Revision history for this message
David Britton (dpb) wrote :

Great -- tested and registered a client like a pro.

review: Approve
Revision history for this message
Fernando Correa Neto (fcorrea) wrote :

Test run succeeded.

review: Approve

Preview Diff

[H/L] Next/Prev Comment, [J/K] Next/Prev File, [N/P] Next/Prev Hunk
The diff is not available at this time. You can reload the page or download it.

Subscribers

People subscribed via source and target branches

to all changes: