share-app

Merge lp://staging/~sergiusens/share-app/testing_artifacts into lp://staging/share-app

  1. testing_artifacts
  2. Merge into trunk
Proposed by Sergio Schvezov
Status: Merged
Approved by: Ugo Riboni
Approved revision: 76
Merged at revision: 76
Proposed branch: lp://staging/~sergiusens/share-app/testing_artifacts
Merge into: lp://staging/share-app
Diff against target: 15 lines (+4/-1)
1 file modified
tests/unittests/CMakeLists.txt (+4/-1)
To merge this branch: bzr merge lp://staging/~sergiusens/share-app/testing_artifacts
Reviewer Review Type Date Requested Status
Ugo Riboni (community) Approve
PS Jenkins bot continuous-integration Approve
Review via email: mp+177359@code.staging.launchpad.net

Commit message

Adding test case xml output for make test target.

This project already had the coverage rules in place and was just missing the test case output:

find . -name '*.xml'
./build/tests/unittests/tst_ImageResizer.xml
./build/coverage.xml

Description of the change

adding test case xml output

To post a comment you must log in.
Revision history for this message
PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote :

PASSED: Continuous integration, rev:76
http://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/share-app-ci/38/
Executed test runs:
    SUCCESS: http://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/generic-mediumtests-saucy/1646
    SUCCESS: http://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/share-app-saucy-amd64-ci/13
    SUCCESS: http://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/share-app-saucy-armhf-ci/13
        deb: http://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/share-app-saucy-armhf-ci/13/artifact/work/output/*zip*/output.zip
    SUCCESS: http://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/share-app-saucy-i386-ci/13
    SUCCESS: http://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/generic-mediumtests-builder-saucy/1650
        deb: http://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/generic-mediumtests-builder-saucy/1650/artifact/work/output/*zip*/output.zip
    SUCCESS: http://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/generic-mediumtests-runner-saucy/1395

Click here to trigger a rebuild:
http://s-jenkins:8080/job/share-app-ci/38/rebuild

review: Approve (continuous-integration)
Revision history for this message
Ugo Riboni (uriboni) wrote :

Looks ok to me and jenkins likes it too.

review: Approve

Preview Diff

[H/L] Next/Prev Comment, [J/K] Next/Prev File, [N/P] Next/Prev Hunk
The diff is not available at this time. You can reload the page or download it.

Subscribers

People subscribed via source and target branches