*** Submitted:
charm: use functions for validation
R=dimitern, danilo.segan CC= https://codereview.appspot.com/8585043
https://codereview.appspot.com/8585043/diff/1/charm/url_test.go File charm/url_test.go (left):
https://codereview.appspot.com/8585043/diff/1/charm/url_test.go#oldcode121 charm/url_test.go:121: var validRegexpTests = []struct { On 2013/04/09 18:16:37, danilo.segan wrote: > It's probably worthwhile to rename this to validCheckerTests as well (unless I > am missing something).
Indeed, thanks.
https://codereview.appspot.com/8585043/diff/1/charm/url_test.go#oldcode166 charm/url_test.go:166: for i, t := range validRegexpTests { On 2013/04/09 18:16:37, danilo.segan wrote: > See above.
Done.
https://codereview.appspot.com/8585043/
« Back to merge proposal
*** Submitted:
charm: use functions for validation
R=dimitern, danilo.segan /codereview. appspot. com/8585043
CC=
https:/
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/8585043/ diff/1/ charm/url_ test.go
File charm/url_test.go (left):
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/8585043/ diff/1/ charm/url_ test.go# oldcode121 test.go: 121: var validRegexpTests = []struct {
charm/url_
On 2013/04/09 18:16:37, danilo.segan wrote:
> It's probably worthwhile to rename this to validCheckerTests as well
(unless I
> am missing something).
Indeed, thanks.
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/8585043/ diff/1/ charm/url_ test.go# oldcode166 test.go: 166: for i, t := range validRegexpTests {
charm/url_
On 2013/04/09 18:16:37, danilo.segan wrote:
> See above.
Done.
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/8585043/