Merge lp://staging/~mzanetti/unity-api/fix-launcher-tests-with-5.3 into lp://staging/unity-api

Proposed by Michael Zanetti
Status: Merged
Approved by: Albert Astals Cid
Approved revision: 135
Merged at revision: 135
Proposed branch: lp://staging/~mzanetti/unity-api/fix-launcher-tests-with-5.3
Merge into: lp://staging/unity-api
Diff against target: 47 lines (+19/-19)
1 file modified
test/qmltest/mocks/plugins/Unity/Launcher/Mocks/MockLauncherModel.cpp (+19/-19)
To merge this branch: bzr merge lp://staging/~mzanetti/unity-api/fix-launcher-tests-with-5.3
Reviewer Review Type Date Requested Status
Timo Jyrinki Approve
Albert Astals Cid (community) Approve
PS Jenkins bot (community) continuous-integration Approve
Review via email: mp+220623@code.staging.launchpad.net

Commit message

properly parent mock items otherwise QML deletes them as of 5.2

Description of the change

 * Are there any related MPs required for this MP to build/function as expected? Please list.

No

 * Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of your code change and any related functionality?

yes, tests still pass on desktop, also pass again on armhf with 5.3

 * Did you make sure that your branch does not contain spurious tags?

yip yip

 * If you changed the packaging (debian), did you subscribe the ubuntu-unity team to this MP?

nope

 * If you changed the UI, has there been a design review?

nope

To post a comment you must log in.
Revision history for this message
PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote :
review: Approve (continuous-integration)
Revision history for this message
Albert Astals Cid (aacid) wrote :

* Did you perform an exploratory manual test run of the code change and any related functionality?
Yes, tests pass, this is a mock only change so that's all that matters

 * Did CI run pass?
Yes

review: Approve
Revision history for this message
Timo Jyrinki (timo-jyrinki) wrote :

Ahum:
https://launchpad.net/~canonical-qt5-edgers/+archive/qt5-beta2/+sourcepub/4193011/+listing-archive-extra

So fixed on armhf (=worth landing), continues to be problematic on i386. Interesting.

review: Approve
Revision history for this message
Michael Zanetti (mzanetti) wrote :

Timo, the new crash is another module (Launcher vs ApplicationManager). Will look a that too, but in a different MP.

Preview Diff

[H/L] Next/Prev Comment, [J/K] Next/Prev File, [N/P] Next/Prev Hunk
The diff is not available at this time. You can reload the page or download it.

Subscribers

People subscribed via source and target branches

to all changes: