Merge lp://staging/~mtmiller/ubuntu/wily/octave/fix-build-and-break into lp://staging/ubuntu/wily-proposed/octave

Proposed by Mike Miller
Status: Merged
Merge reported by: Sebastien Bacher
Merged at revision: not available
Proposed branch: lp://staging/~mtmiller/ubuntu/wily/octave/fix-build-and-break
Merge into: lp://staging/ubuntu/wily-proposed/octave
Diff against target: 5977 lines (+5836/-39)
9 files modified
.pc/applied-patches (+1/-0)
.pc/qt-requires-opengl.patch/configure.ac (+3228/-0)
.pc/qt-requires-opengl.patch/m4/acinclude.m4 (+2448/-0)
configure.ac (+6/-0)
debian/changelog (+8/-0)
debian/control (+23/-39)
debian/patches/qt-requires-opengl.patch (+75/-0)
debian/patches/series (+1/-0)
m4/acinclude.m4 (+46/-0)
To merge this branch: bzr merge lp://staging/~mtmiller/ubuntu/wily/octave/fix-build-and-break
Reviewer Review Type Date Requested Status
Sebastien Bacher Approve
Review via email: mp+266672@code.staging.launchpad.net

This proposal supersedes a proposal from 2015-08-02.

Description of the change

This branch includes two changes necessary for a functional Octave 4.0.0 in wily. The first change fixes a build failure on the armhf architecture using a patch I am proposing for inclusion upstream. The patch disables building the Qt components of Octave when Qt was configured for GLES, as it appears to be on Ubuntu armhf. The second change updates the list of Breaks to the versions currently found in wily (some of which are already good for Octave 4.0, some of which will need to be rebuilt).

I've done a test build of the qt-requires-opengl.patch in my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~mtmiller/+archive/ubuntu/octave/+packages). The armhf build hasn't completed yet but it at least got past the point where the error appeared in 4.0.0-3.

To post a comment you must log in.
Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

Seems like the patch has been merged in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/octave/4.0.0-3ubuntu1, can you please resubmit the other change if it still applies? thanks

review: Approve
Revision history for this message
Mike Miller (mtmiller) wrote :

Thanks for your review anyway. It's easier for folks with upload rights to take care of these changes, looks like both of my changes have been taken care of by others now. Thanks for your hard work!

Preview Diff

[H/L] Next/Prev Comment, [J/K] Next/Prev File, [N/P] Next/Prev Hunk
The diff is not available at this time. You can reload the page or download it.

Subscribers

People subscribed via source and target branches

to all changes: