Merge lp://staging/~mileo/ocb-addons/70-bug-1201472 into lp://staging/ocb-addons

Status: Merged
Approved by: Holger Brunn (Therp)
Approved revision: no longer in the source branch.
Merged at revision: 10012
Proposed branch: lp://staging/~mileo/ocb-addons/70-bug-1201472
Merge into: lp://staging/ocb-addons
Diff against target: 41 lines (+8/-8)
1 file modified
l10n_br/account_view.xml (+8/-8)
To merge this branch: bzr merge lp://staging/~mileo/ocb-addons/70-bug-1201472
Reviewer Review Type Date Requested Status
Raphaël Valyi - http://www.akretion.com Approve
Holger Brunn (Therp) Approve
Guewen Baconnier @ Camptocamp Approve
Stefan Rijnhart (Opener) Approve
Pedro Manuel Baeza code review Approve
Review via email: mp+208722@code.staging.launchpad.net
To post a comment you must log in.
Revision history for this message
Pedro Manuel Baeza (pedro.baeza) wrote :

LGTM

Still with pieces of group_extended issues... uff

Regards.

review: Approve (code review)
Revision history for this message
Stefan Rijnhart (Opener) (stefan-opener) wrote :

LGTM

review: Approve
Revision history for this message
Guewen Baconnier @ Camptocamp (gbaconnier-c2c) wrote :

LGTM

review: Approve
Revision history for this message
Raphaël Valyi - http://www.akretion.com (rvalyi) wrote :

Thanks for spotting this one Luis! And welcome to to free world!

review: Approve
Revision history for this message
Holger Brunn (Therp) (hbrunn) wrote :

The patch for trunk uses group_no_one (Technical features), which seems correct to me: https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-dev/openobject-addons/trunk-bug-1201472-cod/+merge/194657

review: Needs Fixing (code review)
Revision history for this message
Luis Felipe Miléo - http://www.kmee.com.br (mileo) wrote :

> The patch for trunk uses group_no_one (Technical features), which seems
> correct to me: https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-dev/openobject-addons
> /trunk-bug-1201472-cod/+merge/194657

The patch don't works well:

https://docs.google.com/a/mileo.co/file/d/0B7HCiq00tc2ndUh5U1c2SmV0N0E/edit

Personally I think this type of functionality should not be hidden in a group. They are decisive for Brazilian companies wishing to use openerp.

Revision history for this message
Holger Brunn (Therp) (hbrunn) wrote :

Okay, makes sense

review: Approve
Revision history for this message
Raphaël Valyi - http://www.akretion.com (rvalyi) wrote :

Hello, I also think Luis is right not asking additional tech group to see these fields.

review: Approve

Preview Diff

[H/L] Next/Prev Comment, [J/K] Next/Prev File, [N/P] Next/Prev Hunk
The diff is not available at this time. You can reload the page or download it.