Merge lp://staging/~ltrager/maas-images/edge into lp://staging/maas-images
Status: | Merged |
---|---|
Merged at revision: | 352 |
Proposed branch: | lp://staging/~ltrager/maas-images/edge |
Merge into: | lp://staging/maas-images |
Diff against target: |
213 lines (+88/-71) 3 files modified
conf/meph-v3.yaml (+80/-70) meph2/netinst.py (+1/-0) meph2/stream.py (+7/-1) |
To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp://staging/~ltrager/maas-images/edge |
Related bugs: |
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Andres Rodriguez (community) | Approve | ||
Review via email:
|
Commit message
Add hwe-16.04-edge and hwe-16.
This adds the hwe-16.04-edge and hwe-16.
Description of the change
A test stream is up at http://
A diff of meph-v3.yaml with the extra spaces removed is at http://
I think its probably best to leave the white space changes on precise and trusty out.
That will make all those lines 'blame' to this, which just makes digging more difficult. The releases really do stand mostly on their own . I understand you were trying to align the fields across all releases, but doing so means maintaining that in the future (on a long kernel name or something), which just means more arbitrary white space changes.
It also makes this file unnecessarily different to the v2 conf in those lines.
I'm not terrribly fussed about it, but i'd leave them out.
The other comment / question I have is wrt to hwe-16.10. Why do we want or need that ?
Wouldn't it be sufficient to say that ga-16.10 supports hwe-16.10 ?
As it is right now, i think that you'll end up creating 2 different initramfs due to their timestamps and such, and then publishing those 2 different things for download. That will waste space and generally be confusing ... "Why are those different?".