Code review comment for lp://staging/~jameinel/subunit/omit-times-623654
Revision history for this message
| Jonathan Lange (jml) wrote | # |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
5466644
demo site
(Get the code!)
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Robert Collins
<email address hidden> wrote:
> I think keeping the first time is actually ok and quite interesting.
> The rest I agree with.
FWIW, the way the branch behaves now it keeps the first timestamp
after the last interesting event and the first timestamp before the
next interesting event. So....
<BEGINNING>
time: 1
time: N
test: event
error: event
time: N + A
time: N + A + B
test: event2
error: event2
time: N + A + B + C
<END>
jml