Merge lp://staging/~gnuoy/openstack-mojo-specs/add-designate-ha-tests into lp://staging/openstack-mojo-specs
Proposed by
Liam Young
Status: | Merged |
---|---|
Merged at revision: | 327 |
Proposed branch: | lp://staging/~gnuoy/openstack-mojo-specs/add-designate-ha-tests |
Merge into: | lp://staging/openstack-mojo-specs |
Diff against target: |
747 lines (+578/-8) 9 files modified
helper/bundles/designate-next-ha.yaml (+406/-0) helper/collect/collect-next-reactive-xenial (+1/-0) helper/setup/preflight.py (+1/-0) helper/tests/expand_and_shrink_bind.py (+59/-0) helper/utils/mojo_os_utils.py (+80/-1) specs/full_stack/next_deploy_designate/mitaka/manifest (+8/-2) specs/full_stack/next_deploy_designate/newton/manifest (+8/-2) specs/full_stack/next_deploy_designate/ocata/manifest (+7/-1) specs/full_stack/next_deploy_designate/pike/manifest (+8/-2) |
To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp://staging/~gnuoy/openstack-mojo-specs/add-designate-ha-tests |
Related bugs: |
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
David Ames (community) | Approve | ||
Review via email:
|
To post a comment you must log in.
A couple of stray debug prints.
But also we seem to be using the first version of the next_deploy_ designate spec while changing the bundle from reactive-next.yaml to designate- next.yaml.
Do the original tests all pass?
Should we get rid of one or the other of the bundles?
The original intent of reactive-next.yaml was to have a place for all of the new charms.
Should this be the HA version of that?