Reviewers: mp+190780_code.launchpad.net, Message: Please take a look. Description: Change distfile to exclude unnecessary bits In order to address the charm deployment problems reported today, this is a first step of two that significantly shrinks the size of our releases. It takes our release down from about 43M to 9M; that brings our charm from about 45M to 11M. I'll make another step (switch from gz to xz) that can bring us down another couple of M. Hopefully that will be sufficient for the problem. The code is pretty easy to review, but the qa is a bit more tedious. First, please make a distfile (BRANCH_IS_GOOD=1 make distfile) and then follow the instructions I added to the release instructions to test the resulting tarball. Second, add the tarball to a local copy of the charm in the releases directory, remove the 0.10.1 tarball, juju bootstrap, and run make deploy in the charm. Once the charm is deployed, you should be able to see qa the site. https://code.launchpad.net/~gary/juju-gui/bug1218924/+merge/190780 (do not edit description out of merge proposal) Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/14516054/ Affected files (+32, -5 lines): M Makefile A [revision details] M docs/process.rst Index: Makefile === modified file 'Makefile' --- Makefile 2013-09-04 10:48:56 +0000 +++ Makefile 2013-10-12 01:30:26 +0000 @@ -551,6 +551,8 @@ mkdir -p releases # When creating the tarball, ensure all symbolic links are followed. tar -c --auto-compress --exclude-vcs --exclude releases \ + --exclude node_modules --exclude virtualenv --exclude app \ + --exclude bin --exclude archives --exclude build-shared \ --dereference --transform "s|^|$(RELEASE_NAME)/|" -f $(RELEASE_FILE) * @echo "Release was created in $(RELEASE_FILE)." else Index: [revision details] === added file '[revision details]' --- [revision details] 2012-01-01 00:00:00 +0000 +++ [revision details] 2012-01-01 00:00:00 +0000 @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +Old revision: