Cinder

Merge lp://staging/~cbjchen/cinder/lp1514325 into lp://staging/~ubuntu-server-dev/cinder/kilo

lp1514325
Merge into kilo

Proposed by Liang Chen on 2015-12-25

Status:

Rejected

Rejected by:

Marc Deslauriers on 2016-04-12

Proposed branch:

lp://staging/~cbjchen/cinder/lp1514325

Merge into:

lp://staging/~ubuntu-server-dev/cinder/kilo

Diff against target:

75 lines (+55/-0)

3 files modified

debian/changelog (+7/-0)
debian/patches/encode-repr-return.patch (+47/-0)
debian/patches/series (+1/-0)

To merge this branch:

bzr merge lp://staging/~cbjchen/cinder/lp1514325

Undecided

Invalid

Link a bug report

Reviewer	Review Type	Date Requested	Status
Marc Deslauriers		2015-12-25	Disapprove on 2016-04-12
Review via email: mp+281351@code.staging.launchpad.net

Description of the change

SRU LP#1514325

Revision history for this message

Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote on 2016-01-15:

Thank you for the work. The bug doesn't mention if the issue is fixed in wily and xenial, could you check and update the report? Is there also a point doing a SRU for vivid now, knowing it's neither a LTS nor a current stable version...

Revision history for this message

Liang Chen (cbjchen) wrote on 2016-01-16:

Hi Sebastien,

Thank you for considering the merge proposal.
The code that introduces this bug was moved to an independent project(python-oslo.versionedobjects) for wily and later. So fix will need to be done there. I have backported the fix into stable/liberty branch in OpenStack upstream repository. And I can propose a SRU for ubuntu python-oslo.versionedobjects package if the fix has not been brought in. But for cinder package, nothing needs to be done for wily and later.

Thanks.
Liang

Revision history for this message

Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote on 2016-04-12:

Thanks for the merge request, but since vivid is now End of Life, I am rejecting it.

review: Disapprove