> Good suggestions Andreas. I dug into debian and discovered they were indeed
> aware of the problem, incl. the specific bug that spawned our patch:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612634
>
> However, they appear to have chosen the approach of listing both the .0 and .1
> in their dist.conf/logfiles/maillog.conf file.
>
> Presumably if there is no .0, it's just ignored? If so, perhaps this change
> could simply be dropped from our changeset?
Something to check, I don't know the behavior. If you can check a few logrotate runs, see what happens, and turns out it's a no-op, then +1 for dropping that delta as well.
> Good suggestions Andreas. I dug into debian and discovered they were indeed /bugs.debian. org/cgi- bin/bugreport. cgi?bug= 612634 logfiles/ maillog. conf file.
> aware of the problem, incl. the specific bug that spawned our patch:
>
> https:/
>
> However, they appear to have chosen the approach of listing both the .0 and .1
> in their dist.conf/
>
> Presumably if there is no .0, it's just ignored? If so, perhaps this change
> could simply be dropped from our changeset?
Something to check, I don't know the behavior. If you can check a few logrotate runs, see what happens, and turns out it's a no-op, then +1 for dropping that delta as well.