Author: CI Train Bot Account
Revision Date: 2015-08-05 10:50:34 UTC

New rebuild forced.

Author: CI Train Bot Account
Revision Date: 2015-08-05 10:50:34 UTC

New rebuild forced.

Author: CI Train Bot Account
Revision Date: 2015-03-26 00:05:51 UTC

[ Loïc Minier ]
Fix dependency on transitional package; should fix multi-arch
installation of armhf package on an amd64 system.

Author: CI Train Bot Account
Revision Date: 2015-03-26 00:05:51 UTC

[ Loïc Minier ]
Fix dependency on transitional package; should fix multi-arch
installation of armhf package on an amd64 system.

Author: PS Jenkins bot
Revision Date: 2014-10-15 20:02:39 UTC

[ Ricardo Salveti de Araujo ]
alarm: using the right type for the alarm type when setting up the
hw alarm (LP: #1376125)

Author: PS Jenkins bot
Revision Date: 2014-10-15 20:02:39 UTC

[ Ricardo Salveti de Araujo ]
alarm: using the right type for the alarm type when setting up the
hw alarm (LP: #1376125)

Author: PS Jenkins bot
Revision Date: 2014-04-11 21:09:05 UTC

[ Gerry Boland ]
* Manually call mir's SurfacePlacementStrategy::place and
  SessionListener::surface_created methods for in process client
  Surface Mir 0.1.8 refactoring causes in-process client surfaces to
  be an implementation detail of Mir's surface stack, and prevents
  shell from getting access to its surface to position it and define
  input areas on it. To fix this,we perform the following: 1. Create
  an InProcessClientSession to represent the in-process client 2. Get
  access to Mir's SurfacePlacementStrategy object and call its place
  method explicitly, to allow shell to position its surface 3. Get
  access to Mir's SessionListener object and call its surface_created
  method explicitly, to notify shell its surface was created

[ Alan Griffiths ]
* Changes for compatibility with Mir 0.1.8

[ Ubuntu daily release ]
* New rebuild forced

Author: PS Jenkins bot
Revision Date: 2014-04-11 21:09:05 UTC

[ Gerry Boland ]
* Manually call mir's SurfacePlacementStrategy::place and
  SessionListener::surface_created methods for in process client
  Surface Mir 0.1.8 refactoring causes in-process client surfaces to
  be an implementation detail of Mir's surface stack, and prevents
  shell from getting access to its surface to position it and define
  input areas on it. To fix this,we perform the following: 1. Create
  an InProcessClientSession to represent the in-process client 2. Get
  access to Mir's SurfacePlacementStrategy object and call its place
  method explicitly, to allow shell to position its surface 3. Get
  access to Mir's SessionListener object and call its surface_created
  method explicitly, to notify shell its surface was created

[ Alan Griffiths ]
* Changes for compatibility with Mir 0.1.8

[ Ubuntu daily release ]
* New rebuild forced

Author: PS Jenkins bot
Revision Date: 2013-10-15 02:39:54 UTC

[ Robert Carr ]
* It seems events of mir_event_type_surface may lead to passing an
  uninitialized ubuntu event in to qtubuntu. Drop these events for
  now.

[ Kevin Gunn ]
* bump mir build dep 0.0.15 & libmirserver7.

[ Alexandros Frantzis ]
* mirclient: Return a null UApplicationInstance* when failing to
  connect to the mir server. (LP: #1233988)

[ Ubuntu daily release ]
* Automatic snapshot from revision 167

Author: PS Jenkins bot
Revision Date: 2013-10-15 02:39:54 UTC

[ Robert Carr ]
* It seems events of mir_event_type_surface may lead to passing an
  uninitialized ubuntu event in to qtubuntu. Drop these events for
  now.

[ Kevin Gunn ]
* bump mir build dep 0.0.15 & libmirserver7.

[ Alexandros Frantzis ]
* mirclient: Return a null UApplicationInstance* when failing to
  connect to the mir server. (LP: #1233988)

[ Ubuntu daily release ]
* Automatic snapshot from revision 167